Critique Groups vs
Critique Partners

Both models work — they're just built for different goals. Here's when each one fits, and why many writers run both.

Format
Critique Groups

3–5 writers in a single cohort, fixed start and end dates.

Critique Partners (1:1)

Ongoing 1:1 manuscript swap with one trusted reader.

Feedback diversity
Critique Groups

Multiple perspectives per chapter, so you see patterns instead of preferences.

Critique Partners (1:1)

Deep but narrow — one reader's instincts.

Commitment
Critique Groups

8, 12, or 18 weeks with scheduled deadlines.

Critique Partners (1:1)

Open-ended; lasts as long as the relationship works.

Pricing model
Critique Groups

$49 one-time per cycle, paid once.

Critique Partners (1:1)

Monthly subscription to keep matching active.

Failure mode it solves
Critique Groups

"I want diverse feedback and built-in accountability."

Critique Partners (1:1)

"I want one writer who really gets my book."

Best for
Critique Groups

Pushing a single draft forward on a real deadline.

Critique Partners (1:1)

Long-term writing partner across multiple drafts.

When a critique group is the right hire

If you want diverse feedback on a specific draft, with deadlines that force you to actually finish — that's a critique group. You trade depth for breadth, get multiple readers per chapter, and walk away when the cycle ends.

When a 1:1 partner is the right hire

If you want one reader who follows your work across drafts, learns your obsessions, and pushes you on the same blind spots over and over — that's a critique partner. The relationship is open-ended and improves as the reader learns your project.

Use both

Many writers join a critique group cycle when they need to push a manuscript over the line, and keep a CritiqueMatch subscription for an ongoing partner between cycles. Different problems, different tools.